This question has to be answered by those who know the details of the history and the world’s conditions at that time. Stereotypical answers like, “no they should not have done it because it is immoral and unethical to use a mass destruction weapon against people” don’t make sense when you don’t know the whole story because the US administration also knew these things. They haven’t been idiots. They were smart people who had their own reasons to do it. So, if you know the whole story, would you do the same, or would you do something else that could also work like how nuclear bombs worked and made Japan surrender within a few days??? Give a good answer and win 1,000,000 points. Thank you!
That’s a tuff Question it’s like Russia threat to Nato should Putin end the war with Nuclear Bombs.
Ultimately President Truman decision to use Nuclear weapons against Japan was based on a number of Factors,Including the desire to end the war quickly and minimize causalities on both sides, as well the perceived need to demonstrate the devastating power of the new weapon to deter future aggression. So it’s complex and controversial one however if I was The us administrator Nuclear weapon should to be avoided at all cost .